Finance · Process breakdown
Automate the checklist and the reconciliations, let AI draft the variance notes, and keep the judgement calls with the controller.
The month-end close process is a checklist, and checklists are what automation is good at. Most of the month-end close process is collecting balances, running reconciliations, posting recurring journals and chasing the people who owe you a number. The judgement is concentrated in a few places: accruals, unusual variances, and the story you tell management. Treat the close as six kinds of work with different verdicts rather than one heroic week, and the automation opportunities become obvious. Start with the month-end close checklist itself: if it lives in a spreadsheet that one person owns, make it a shared, dated list with an owner per line before you automate a single step.
The checklist becomes a workflow: tasks open on schedule, owners get reminders, and a dependency blocks the next step until the previous one is signed off. Status is visible without asking.
Depreciation, prepayments, recurring accruals, and the accounts payable and receivable close run from templates once their inputs are confirmed. The same entries every month do not need a person typing them.
Bank, intercompany and clearing accounts are matched automatically, so only the unmatched items reach a person. This is the step that usually eats the most calendar days.
AI compares the month with budget and prior periods and drafts the explanation for the movements, citing the transactions behind them. The controller edits and confirms the story.
The controller judges what to accrue, how to treat a one-off, and when an estimate needs a note. These decisions shape the result, so they stay with an accountable person.
AI reads the finished management pack, checks that the narrative and the numbers agree, and flags a figure that does not tie back to the ledger before the controller signs.
Move the checklist into a workflow tool for one close and automate nothing else. Measure which tasks finished late, which reminders were needed, and where people waited on each other. Automate the reconciliation with the most unmatched items next, and compare its unmatched list with the manual one for two closes.
Automating steps around an unclear checklist. If nobody can say which task is blocking day three, faster reconciliations just move the queue.
One line per task with an owner, a due day relative to month end, the system or report involved, and a sign-off. Group the lines by area: transactions and sub-ledgers, journals and accruals, reconciliations, review and reporting. Add the dependencies explicitly, so a reconciliation cannot be signed off before the bank feed is complete. A checklist template is a start; the owners and dates are what make it work.
The parts with structured inputs and stable rules: opening tasks on schedule, reminders, recurring journals, sub-ledger closes, and account reconciliations. That is usually the bulk of the elapsed time. Accrual judgements, the treatment of unusual items, and the explanation to management stay with people, with AI helping to draft the commentary. Measure your own close first; the split differs by company.
At the judgement calls and the sign-off. The controller decides accruals and estimates, approves how one-offs are treated, and signs the pack. A reviewer other than the preparer checks material items. Automation should make the status and the exceptions visible earlier in the close, not remove the moment where someone accountable says the numbers are right.
Illustrative workflow guidance by Arcgent. Each business needs its own assessment. No integration or savings claim has been verified for your systems.
Get an assessment based on your own steps, systems, and constraints.
Audit my process See an example report ↗